linux-kernel - Re: cups slow on linux-2.6.24

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080131.181209.193710785.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 31 Jan 2008 18:12:09 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	davidn@...idnewall.com
Cc:	kaber@...sh.net, kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu,
	jeff.chua.linux@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	ole@....pl, cups-bugs@...ysw.com, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: cups slow on linux-2.6.24

From: David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 11:17:14 +1030

> Patrick McHardy wrote:
> > Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote:
> >> Strange, but there are a lot of incorrect checksum packets. How does
> >> it come on the loopback interface?
> >
> > Loopback doesn't perform full checksumming, so thats expected.
> 
> The question remains: How do loopback packets get incorrect checksum? 
> Where and how can they get corrupted?

There are zeros there, which is an incorrect checksum most
of the time.

Tcpdump is just not knowledgable about this and tries to
validate the checksum as if it were computed correctly.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/