[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1201883579.15090.14.camel@violet>
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 17:32:59 +0100
From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
To: dsterba@...e.cz
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jkosina@...e.cz, benm@...metric.co.nz, stephen@...metric.co.nz
Subject: Re: [PATCH][v4] ipwireless: driver for 3G PC Card
Hi David,
> +irqreturn_t ipwireless_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id, struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> + struct ipw_hardware *hw = dev_id;
> +
> + if (hw->hw_version == HW_VERSION_1)
> + return ipwireless_handle_v1_interrupt(irq, hw);
> + else
> + return ipwireless_handle_v2_v3_interrupt(irq, hw);
> +}
why is this not static? I think the interrupt routine should be in the
file where you actually claim the interrupt.
> +/*
> + * Associate the specified network with this hardware, so it will receive events
> + * from it.
> + */
> +void ipwireless_associate_network(struct ipw_hardware *hw,
> + struct ipw_network *network)
> +{
> + hw->network = network;
> +}
I think a #define would be simpler in this case.
> +module_param(tty_major, int, 0);
> +module_param_named(debug, ipwireless_debug, int, 0);
> +module_param_named(loopback, ipwireless_loopback, int, 0);
> +module_param_named(out_queue, ipwireless_out_queue, int, 0);
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(tty_major, "ttyIPWp major number [0]");
Why is allowing to change the major still needed. I think we passed the
bridge of the need for static numbers a long long long time ago.
> +static const char drv_name[] = IPWIRELESS_PCCARD_NAME;
This looks useless to. Do we need that?
Regards
Marcel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists