[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080201024742.GD26420@sgi.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 20:47:42 -0600
From: Robin Holt <holt@....com>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc: Robin Holt <holt@....com>, Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@...ranet.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>, Izik Eidus <izike@...ranet.com>,
kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, steiner@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
daniel.blueman@...drics.com
Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] mmu_notifier: Core code
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 06:39:19PM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, Robin Holt wrote:
>
> > Jack has repeatedly pointed out needing an unregister outside the
> > mmap_sem. I still don't see the benefit to not having the lock in the mm.
>
> I never understood why this would be needed. ->release removes the
> mmu_notifier right now.
Both xpmem and GRU have means of removing their context seperate from
process termination. XPMEMs is by closing the fd, I believe GRU is
the same. In the case of XPMEM, we are able to acquire the mmap_sem.
For GRU, I don't think it is possible, but I do not remember the exact
reason.
Thanks,
Robin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists