| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20080201211734.GD4199@ics.muni.cz> Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 22:17:34 +0100 From: Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@....muni.cz> To: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@...el.com> Subject: Re: 2.6.24-git9 ACPI oops - regression On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 12:07:03PM -0500, Len Brown wrote: > this worked in 2.6.24? At least in 2.6.24-rc8 seemed to be OK, for the first time, I encountered the bug in 2.6.24-git4. 2.6.24-git6 seemed to be OK. 2.6.24-git9 is not. > You are running the "dock" driver in both cases? I use thinkpad acpi module, ACPI_DOCK is always built in. > Is this reproducible? In 2.6.24-git4, it was 100% reproducible - just pressing undock button on the dock and the oops has been generated. In 2.6.24-git9, I do not know, whether it is reproducible or not. And as I'm ill and my dock is in work, I'm not sure when I be ready to test it again. > If yes, please open a bugzilla entry here: > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=ACPI > Component = Config-hotplug > > and attach the output from acpidump do you need just acpidump as is or should I do acpidump when docked? -- Lukáš Hejtmánek -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists