linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.24-git9 ACPI oops

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 1 Feb 2008 22:17:34 +0100
From:	Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@....muni.cz>
To:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@...el.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-git9 ACPI oops - regression

On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 12:07:03PM -0500, Len Brown wrote:
> this worked in 2.6.24?

At least in 2.6.24-rc8 seemed to be OK, for the first time, I encountered the
bug in 2.6.24-git4. 2.6.24-git6 seemed to be OK. 2.6.24-git9 is not. 

> You are running the "dock" driver in both cases?

I use thinkpad acpi module, ACPI_DOCK is always built in.

> Is this reproducible?

In 2.6.24-git4, it was 100% reproducible - just pressing undock button on the
dock and the oops has been generated.

In 2.6.24-git9, I do not know, whether it is reproducible or not. And as I'm
ill and my dock is in work, I'm not sure when I be ready to test it again.

> If yes, please open a bugzilla entry here:
> 
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=ACPI
> Component = Config-hotplug
> 
> and attach the output from acpidump

do you need just acpidump as is or should I do acpidump when docked?

-- 
Lukáš Hejtmánek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/