[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0802012250251.18790@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 22:51:14 +0100 (CET)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Are Section mismatches out of control?
On Feb 1 2008 12:10, Andi Kleen wrote:
>On Friday 01 February 2008 11:47:18 Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>> James said in a related posting that the Section mismatch
>> warnings were getting out of control.
>
>My question is: where are crashes? If the sections were
>really in such bad shape and since we poison (and sometimes
>even unmap) init after boot we should in theory see a lot
>of oops reports from this if there were really accesses to
>them after boot.
>
>Where are they?
Perhaps still in RAM? Explicitly zero the area after unmapping,
maybe something happens.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists