[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0801311852140.6272@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 19:01:44 -0800 (PST)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Robin Holt <holt@....com>
cc: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@...ranet.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>, Izik Eidus <izike@...ranet.com>,
kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, steiner@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
daniel.blueman@...drics.com
Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] mmu_notifier: Core code
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, Robin Holt wrote:
> Both xpmem and GRU have means of removing their context seperate from
> process termination. XPMEMs is by closing the fd, I believe GRU is
> the same. In the case of XPMEM, we are able to acquire the mmap_sem.
> For GRU, I don't think it is possible, but I do not remember the exact
> reason.
For any action initiated from user space you will not hold mmap sem. So
you can call the unregister function. Then you need to do a
synchronize_rcu before freeing the structures.
It is also possible to shut this down outside via f.e. a control thread.
The control thread can acquire mmap_sem and then unregister the notifier.
Am I missing something?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists