[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080201001445.GI19014@plap3.qlogic.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:14:45 -0800
From: Andrew Vasquez <andrew.vasquez@...gic.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <james.bottomley@...eleye.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ink@...assic.park.msu.ru, Alan Cox <alan@...hat.com>,
james.smart@...lex.com, linux-driver@...gic.com,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] pci: Remove users of pci_enable_device_bars()
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 11:42 -0800, Andrew Vasquez wrote:
> > That's fine. I take it these patches will be funneled via
> > gregkh/pci-2.6.git. There's some qla2xxx updates which are queued for
> > post-2.6.24 consumption in jejb/scsi-misc-2.6.git which don't appear
> > to have any conflicts.
> >
> > I do though have a series of patches which I'll hold off on submitting
> > to linux-scsi until these PCI changes are merged, as there's some
> > minor conflicts merging the three branches. James B, will that be
> > fine?
> >
> > The patches themselves appear to be working fine within several of our
> > test rings. I hold off on some of the cleanup post-merge time...
>
> Thanks for testing ! They should be queued with Greg indeed.
Just curious, this patch-set hasn't made it upstream to linux-2.6.git,
will the work be deferred to 2.6.26??
--
av
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists