[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080201233528.GE12099@sgi.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 17:35:28 -0600
From: Robin Holt <holt@....com>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc: Robin Holt <holt@....com>, Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@...ranet.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>, Izik Eidus <izike@...ranet.com>,
kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, steiner@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
daniel.blueman@...drics.com
Subject: Re: [patch 2/4] mmu_notifier: Callbacks to invalidate address
ranges
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 03:19:32PM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Robin Holt wrote:
>
> > We are getting this callout when we transition the pte from a read-only
> > to read-write. Jack and I can not see a reason we would need that
> > callout. It is causing problems for xpmem in that a write fault goes
> > to get_user_pages which gets back to do_wp_page that does the callout.
>
> Right. You placed it there in the first place. So we can drop the code
> from do_wp_page?
No, we need a callout when we are becoming more restrictive, but not
when becoming more permissive. I would have to guess that is the case
for any of these callouts. It is for both GRU and XPMEM. I would
expect the same is true for KVM, but would like a ruling from Andrea on
that.
Thanks,
Robin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists