linux-kernel - Re: [Regression] 2.6.24-git9: RT sched mishandles artswrapper (bisected)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 2 Feb 2008 00:39:58 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Regression] 2.6.24-git9: RT sched mishandles artswrapper (bisected)

On Friday, 1 of February 2008, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 12:50 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday, 1 of February 2008, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> > > > It arts run as root, or does it use RLIMIT_RTPRIO to allow users to
> > > > execute realtime tasks?
> > 
> > artswrapper is setuid root and RLIMIT_RTPRIO is apparently not used.
> > Still, artswrapper is running as a regular user, so it most probably drops
> > privileges early.
> > 
> > BTW, it fails while running the artsmessage utility used for displaying arts
> > error messages, so I guess there's an error in arts that this thing tries to
> > display and deadlocks (or something like that).
> > 
> > Should I test the patch nevertheless?
> 
> Don't think that would help any in this situation. The thing to look out
> for are RT tasks running with a different uid than 0.
> 
> This patch would only stop a task from obtaining RT class scheduling
> when already in a (misconfigured) group. If the task is RT and then
> switches group another - similar - thing is needed.
> 
> Does this artsmessage thing also run with RT priority?

Well, it's in a strange state (after it's broken).  From top:

PR = -51
NI = 0
S = R
%CPU = 0.0
%MEM = 0.0

Here's the corresponding trace from sysrq+t:

artswrapper   R  running task     5128  5776      1
 ffff81007a8dbd88 0000000000000046 000000015c4321b0 ffff81006aa6e5c8
 ffffffff806daa00 ffffffff806daa00 ffffffff806daa00 ffffffff806daa00
 ffffffff806daa00 ffffffff806daa00 ffffffff806d7a60 ffffffff806daa00
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff8022fdb7>] ? try_to_wake_up+0x77/0x200
 [<ffffffff8023573d>] __cond_resched+0x2d/0x60
 [<ffffffff804ddce1>] _cond_resched+0x31/0x40
 [<ffffffff804ddd24>] wait_for_common+0x34/0x170
 [<ffffffff8022fdb7>] ? try_to_wake_up+0x77/0x200
 [<ffffffff804ddec8>] wait_for_completion+0x18/0x20
 [<ffffffff80235aba>] sched_exec+0xba/0xf0
 [<ffffffff802b5a64>] do_execve+0x64/0x220
 [<ffffffff802097c6>] sys_execve+0x46/0x70
 [<ffffffff8020bab7>] stub_execve+0x67/0xb0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/