lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 2 Feb 2008 01:01:17 +0100 (CET)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <>
To:	Sam Ravnborg <>
cc:	Harvey Harrison <>,
	Andrew Morton <>,
	LKML <>,
	linux arch <>,
	James Bottomley <>
Subject: Re: Are Section mismatches out of control?

On Feb 1 2008 23:40, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>> checkpatch does not parse C, it uses heuristical regexes.
>> That makes it very different from sparse or the section mismatch
>> finder which do not output false positives.
>Unfortunately I most correct you. Section mismatch checks seldoms finds
>what I would call 'real' bugs that causes oops - but it happen.
>It is mostly fasle positives that needs workaround, but also a great
>deal of missing annotation resulting in additional memory saved.
>And then occasionally a bad reference in some error handling that
>seldom trigger but when it does it would oops.

What I meant with false positives:=
modpost warning about something that is not true.

I have not yet seen such happening where code is obviously correct
by the eyeball, but modpost gets it wrong.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists