linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: restore correct module name for apm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080203121709.GE20810@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date:	Sun, 3 Feb 2008 13:17:09 +0100
From:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:	"A.E.Lawrence" <lawrence_a_e@...world.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: restore correct module name for apm

On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 11:52:16AM +0000, A.E.Lawrence wrote:
> Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > The apm module were renamed to apm_32 during the merge of 32 and 64 bit x86 which
> > is unfortunate.
> > As apm is 32 bit specific we like to keep the _32 in the filename
> > but the module should be named apm.
> > 
> > Fix this in the Makefile.
> > Reported by "A.E.Lawrence" <lawrence_a_e@...world.com>
> 
> ..snip..
> > 
> > build tested only but obviously correct.
> > 
> > 	Sam
> 
> It is also at
>   http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9877
> which someone (me?) should probably now close.

I please do so.
But I think you should wait until it hits mainline

	Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/