[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2f11576a0802030551s53eeb7b3k450254f3d2cf9ab7@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 22:51:10 +0900
From: "KOSAKI Motohiro" <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: "Pavel Machek" <pavel@....cz>
Cc: "Theodore Tso" <tytso@....edu>, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
"David Chinner" <dgc@....com>,
"Valerie Henson" <val@...consulting.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Andreas Dilger" <adilger@...sterfs.com>,
"Ric Wheeler" <ric@....com>, kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] Parallelize IO for e2fsck
Hi Pavel
> > > As user pages are always in highmem, this should be easy to decide:
> > > only send SIGDANGER when highmem is full. (Yes, there are
> > > inodes/dentries/file descriptors in lowmem, but I doubt apps will
> > > respond to SIGDANGER by closing files).
> >
> > Good point; for a system with at least (say) 2GB of memory, that
> > definitely makes sense. For a system with less than 768 megs of
> > memory (how quaint, but it wasn't that long ago this was a lot of
> > memory :-), there wouldn't *be* any memory in highmem at all....
>
> Ok, so it is 'send SIGDANGER when all zones are low', because user
> allocations can go from all zones (unless you have something really
> exotic, I'm not sure if that is true on huge NUMA machines & similar).
thank you good point out.
to be honest, the zone awareness of current mem_notify is premature.
I think we need enhancement rss statistics to per zone rss.
but not implemented yet ;-)
and, unfortunately I have no highmem machine.
the mem_notify is not so tested on highmem machine.
if you help to test, I am very happy!
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists