linux-kernel - Automated Kernel Testing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47A50EF8.6020507@gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 02 Feb 2008 20:46:48 -0400
From:	Kevin Winchester <kjwinchester@...il.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Automated Kernel Testing


Hi Ingo & Andrew,

Since you both seem to be quite interested in the number of kernel
testers and the reporting of bugs, I figured I would bounce this idea
off of you...

As a part-time kernel tester, I find it interesting to see that Ingo has
tools that are able to automatically configure/build/boot/test kernels,
and it has given me the following ideas:

- For people like me, it would be great if there were a downloadable
collection of tools for performing similar testing on my box here
whenever I'm not using it.
- The tools could build a kernel, boot it, run some standard tests, and
report any problems automatically.
- The kernel oops web site and auto-submit tool seems like it would be a
very good companion to the testing tools (if you don't already have them
integrated).
- In the future, I would expect that a SETI@...e-style testing package
could be integrated into distribution repositories so that users could
do automatic testing (build testing for people scared about data loss,
and boot testing as well for those not worried).

I would be happy to help out with the work in developing this set of
tools (as far as my limited skills allow), but I have a feeling that you
already have most of it in some form.  I think the final piece is just
the integration and marketing so that the barrier to kernel testing gets
lowered considerably.

Does this seem like a reasonable idea, or is it something that you
already had in mind (that it just took me longer to see)?

-- 
Kevin Winchester
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/