lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200802031910.28621.frank@f-seidel.de>
Date:	Sun, 3 Feb 2008 19:10:28 +0100
From:	Frank Seidel <frank@...eidel.de>
To:	Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove unneeded code in sys_getpriority

On Sunday 03 February 2008 18:58, Rabin Vincent wrote:
> Do you mean the PRIO_* cases in the switch?  They're still independent
> of position after the patch because they don't fall through.

Yes, sure, this is fully correct now. Just if somehting whatsoever
is put ahead touching retval one need to take care of this here.
But as i don't have enough experience to know if this likely at all i'm
fully fine with it. Just wanted to note one should think about if
its worth the change.

Thanks,
Frank
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ