[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080203194756.GA28783@farnsworth.org>
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 12:47:56 -0700
From: Dale Farnsworth <dale@...nsworth.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lockdep: Include all lock classes in all_lock_classes
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 04:21:02PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 08:21 -0700, Dale Farnsworth wrote:
> > Add each lock class to the all_lock_classes list when it is
> > first registered.
> >
> > Previously, lock classes were added to all_lock_classes when
> > the lock class was first used.
>
> > Since one of the uses of the list is to find unused locks, this didn't
> > work well.
>
> You mean in lockdep_proc.c to generate the statistics?
Yes, that's where I noticed it. On my platform, there was one
unused lock which was missed.
>
> Another potential issue might be count_matching_names() generating a
> wrong class version.
I haven't looked into that issue yet.
-Dale
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists