[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080203203822.GE2648@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 21:38:22 +0100
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [patch] scsi: fix spurious build failures in aic7xxx
>
> > drivers/base/attribute_container.c: * Copyright (c) 2005 - James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...eleye.com>
> > drivers/base/transport_class.c: * Copyright (c) 2005 - James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...eleye.com>
> > drivers/scsi/raid_class.c: * Copyright (c) 2005 - James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...eleye.com>
> > include/linux/attribute_container.h: * Copyright (c) 2005 - James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...eleye.com>
> > include/linux/raid_class.h: * Copyright (c) 2005 - James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...eleye.com>
> > include/linux/transport_class.h: * Copyright (c) 2005 - James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...eleye.com>
>
> This is less obvious: The copyrights are historical rather than current
> and also, I was at steeleye when I did that work, so it does deserve to
> be reflected in the file history. I know it adds confusion from a whom
> do I contact for this file point of view, but it is legally the right
> thing to do.
When I read the above is that the Copyright are assigned to the
person "James Bottomley" with an email address.
If Steeleye deserve copyrights then _I_ would have
explicitly stated the company name too.
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists