linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] x86 PM: Consolidate suspend and hibernation code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 3 Feb 2008 22:15:19 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] x86 PM: Consolidate suspend and hibernation code


* Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:

> This series of patches consolidates the x86 suspend and hibernation code.
> It does the following:
> - move 64-bit hibernation/suspend files to arch/x86/power (under different
>   names)
> - rename 32-bit files in arch/x86/power in line with the 64-bit files
> - separate hibernation-specific 64-bit code from the code used for both
>   suspend and hibernation and simplify the Makefile
> - fix up comments
> Details are in the changelogs.
> 
> These patches don't introduce any functional changes.

looks sane to me - i've applied them to x86.git. Is it fine with you if 
we push them upstream (barring any test failures)?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/