linux-kernel - Re: [linux-pm] sleepy linux self-test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080203224206.8FD40166811@adsl-69-226-248-13.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net>
Date:	Sun, 03 Feb 2008 14:42:06 -0800
From:	David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To:	rjw@...k.pl
Cc:	pavel@....cz, mingo@...e.hu, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] sleepy linux self-test

> > See the appended; it includes more of Ingo's suggestions.
> > 
> > Since this is increasingly unrelated to the "sleepy linux" concept
> > (a version of what systems like OLPC, N700, and N800 are doing), I
> > got rid of the "sleepy.c" file.
>
> The changes look good to me.

They feel unfinished to me though.  :)

Like using "jiffies" instead of a clocksource, which makes trouble
since the timing covers periods with IRQs disabled.  And the test
mode parameter needs work.


> Well, it would be nice to have this feature in as soon as reasonably possible,
> so that people can include suspend tests in the automated testing.

Except ... "rtcwake" (from util-linux-ng) already supports such
testing, albeit from userspace.   But not the timing tests.

What was the rationale for wanting this done in-kernel?  (Other
than to know it can work portably.)

- Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/