[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080203051425.GA20740@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 06:14:25 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] sleepy linux self-test
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> > OK, here's a version that's cleaner and suspends. Resuming ...
> > another story, it's currently broken on this ARM board (no
> > relationship to this testing code).
>
> yay! Threw this into my setup. It built fine with the new option
> disabled and enabled as well. Unfortunately it said this:
>
> [ 23.509562] Calling initcall 0xc0c49e00: be_sleepy+0x0/0x170()
> [ 23.515837] PM: no wakelarm-capable RTC
> [ 23.517562] initcall 0xc0c49e00: be_sleepy+0x0/0x170() returned 0.
>
> (oh, btw., a small typo: s/wakelarm/wakealarm/)
>
> is "wakealarm" something generally available on PC RTCs? I'll try to
> look into the BIOS setup, maybe it's just disabled ...
ok, there was indeed a "RTC Alarm: disabled" option in the BIOS. But no
matter how many of those resume-alarm options i enabled, the kernel
thinks there's no time capability:
[ 23.541565] Calling initcall 0xc0c49e00: be_sleepy+0x0/0x170()
[ 23.547840] PM: no wakelarm-capable RTC
[ 23.549566] initcall 0xc0c49e00: be_sleepy+0x0/0x170() returned 0.
i could set date/time of wakeup alarm in the BIOS, so i suspect the chip
itself is capable of it. Bootlog and kernel config attached. (maybe i
misconfigured something?)
Ingo
View attachment "config" of type "text/plain" (52856 bytes)
Download attachment "boot.log.bz2" of type "application/x-bzip2" (40988 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists