[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080203070321.GA8293@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 08:03:21 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Pekka Paalanen <pq@....fi>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Pavel Roskin <proski@....org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86: Add a list for custom page fault handlers.
* Pekka Paalanen <pq@....fi> wrote:
> I have two reasons why I'd like to let it be a module:
> - it's "broken", the relay buffers are cleared on module unload
> - it's a lot easier to push updated version for testing to people
>
> Ok, the first one is just a silly excuse, but the second one is to
> avoid forcing non-developer users to patch their kernels. This is a
> much needed tool for the Nouveau project even in it's current form.
i dont think this second problem is a practical one: i've test-merged
mmiotrace two days ago into x86.git and it's holding up very well in my
testing (it has not caused a single hickup so far). It's nice optional
debug functionality and i dont see any reason why not to merge it.
a few cleanup requests:
- please make the pagefault callbacks explicit as Arjan has asked
- any reason why it lives in arch/x86/kernel/mmiotrace/? It should be a
prime-time member of arch/x86/mm/ i think.
- please make it build-in-able, not modules-only.
- [ longer-term: think about integrating pf_in.c with the x86
emulator/disassembler of KVM. ]
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists