[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080204124208.1b32fc04@core>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 12:42:08 +0000
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: "Lee Revell" <rlrevell@...-job.com>
Cc: "Adrian Bunk" <bunk@...nel.org>,
"Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@...tel.com>,
"Giridhar Pemmasani" <pgiri@...oo.com>,
"Pavel Roskin" <proski@....org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Jon Masters" <jonathan@...masters.org>,
"Rusty Russell" <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, rms@....org
Subject: Re: ndiswrapper and GPL-only symbols redux
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:36:19 -0500
"Lee Revell" <rlrevell@...-job.com> wrote:
> On Jan 30, 2008 1:54 PM, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org> wrote:
> > IANAL, and I would therefore ask a lawyer whether, and if yes under
> > which circumstances, shipping a binary driver written for another OS
> > dynamically linked into the Linux kernel would not be a criminal offense.
> >
>
> Please stop throwing around words like "criminal". If this is in fact
> illegal it would be a civil matter.
Actually in large parts of europe multiple repeated infractions of
copyright law are criminal matters.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists