linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] per-process securebits

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47A6661D.7020305@kernel.org>
Date:	Sun, 03 Feb 2008 17:10:53 -0800
From:	"Andrew G. Morgan" <morgan@...nel.org>
To:	Ismail Dönmez <ismail@...dus.org.tr>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Security Modules List 
	<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] per-process securebits

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ismail Dönmez wrote:
| What I meant to ask was what does "per-process securebits" brings as
extra.

It allows you to create a legacy free process tree. For example, a
chroot, or container (which Serge can obviously explain in more detail),
environment in which root has no privilege at all. One in which
privilege comes only from filesystem capabilities.

| FWIW in Pardus 2008 we'll enable Posix file capabilities by default so
people
| could "harden" their setups.

Cheers

Andrew
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHpmYd+bHCR3gb8jsRAlDHAJ9RvFRieU2eUPJUHh7K84NMLmytTQCgupfS
KxdoXz400AeMWJiaikGH9U8=
=yx8I
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/