[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47A73C86.3060604@vlnb.net>
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 19:25:42 +0300
From: Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@...b.net>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
CC: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, scst-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel
James Bottomley wrote:
>>Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
>>So, James, what is your opinion on the above? Or the overall SCSI target
>>project simplicity doesn't matter much for you and you think it's fine
>>to duplicate Linux page cache in the user space to keep the in-kernel
>>part of the project as small as possible?
>
>
> The answers were pretty much contained here
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=120164008302435
>
> and here:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=120171067107293
>
> Weren't they?
No, sorry, it doesn't look so for me. They are about performance, but
I'm asking about the overall project's architecture, namely about one
part of it: simplicity. Particularly, what do you think about
duplicating Linux page cache in the user space to have zero-copy cached
I/O? Or can you suggest another architectural solution for that problem
in the STGT's approach?
Vlad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists