[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47A76106.3000103@gandalf.sssup.it>
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 20:01:26 +0100
From: michael <trimarchi@...dalf.sssup.it>
To: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...el.com>
CC: Remy Bohmer <linux@...mer.net>, fabio@...dalf.sssup.it,
Andrew Victor <linux@...im.org.za>,
Chip Coldwell <coldwell@...hat.com>,
Marc Pignat <marc.pignat@...s.ch>,
David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm v4 6/9] atmel_serial: Split the interrupt handler
Hi
> Haavard
>
> diff --git a/drivers/serial/atmel_serial.c b/drivers/serial/atmel_serial.c
> index 477950f..c61fcc3 100644
> --- a/drivers/serial/atmel_serial.c
> +++ b/drivers/serial/atmel_serial.c
> @@ -337,9 +337,12 @@ atmel_buffer_rx_char(struct uart_port *port, unsigned int status,
> struct circ_buf *ring = &atmel_port->rx_ring;
> struct atmel_uart_char *c;
>
> - if (!CIRC_SPACE(ring->head, ring->tail, ATMEL_SERIAL_RINGSIZE))
> + if (!CIRC_SPACE(ring->head, ring->tail, ATMEL_SERIAL_RINGSIZE)) {
> + dev_err(port->dev, "RX ring buffer full, dropping data\n");
> +
> /* Buffer overflow, ignore char */
> return;
> + }
>
> c = &((struct atmel_uart_char *)ring->buf)[ring->head];
> c->status = status;
>
>
I have already tried that but I have never seen the buffer full. So
tomorrow I can do other
tests with the serial device. I think the the atmel_interrupt handler
must check the
pass_counter before return IRQ_HANDLED.
Regards Michael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists