[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080204193714.GO3426@duck.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 20:37:14 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: marcin.slusarz@...il.com
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] udf: next round of cleanups
On Sun 03-02-08 19:33:45, marcin.slusarz@...il.com wrote:
> Hi
>
> This patchset contains next round of various UDF fs cleanups.
>
> [PATCH 1/6] udf: udf_get_block, inode_bmap - remove unneeded checks
>
> [PATCH 2/6] udf: create function for conversion from timestamp to timespec
> [PATCH 3/6] udf: convert udf_stamp_to_time to return struct timespec
> [PATCH 4/6] udf: convert udf_stamp_to_time and udf_time_to_stamp to use timestamps
> [PATCH 5/6] udf: remove unneeded kernel_timestamp type
> These 4 patches can be folded into one if requested, but I think it's
> easier to analyze them when they are split.
>
> [PATCH 6/6] udf: super.c reorganization
> Pretty mechanical work. Can be dropped and redone if it will
> conflict with someone else patch.
>
> fs/udf/ecma_167.h | 13 -
> fs/udf/inode.c | 183 ++++++-----------
> fs/udf/super.c | 553 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
> fs/udf/udfdecl.h | 8
> fs/udf/udfend.h | 22 --
> fs/udf/udftime.c | 39 +--
> 6 files changed, 358 insertions(+), 460 deletions(-)
>
> Applies on top of patches I've sent lately (http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/30/482)
>
> Jan: Are you going to create git tree for udf?
I was already thinking about it to take some burden from Andrew. So if
you think you are going to have more time for these cleanups then I can
setup one (it would be useless when I send to Andrew one fix per month ;)...
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists