linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -mm v4 6/9] atmel_serial: Split the interrupt handler

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 4 Feb 2008 21:25:23 +0100
From:	Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...el.com>
To:	michael <trimarchi@...dalf.sssup.it>
Cc:	Remy Bohmer <linux@...mer.net>, fabio@...dalf.sssup.it,
	Andrew Victor <linux@...im.org.za>,
	Chip Coldwell <coldwell@...hat.com>,
	Marc Pignat <marc.pignat@...s.ch>,
	David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm v4 6/9] atmel_serial: Split the interrupt handler

On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 20:01:26 +0100
michael <trimarchi@...dalf.sssup.it> wrote:

> I think the the atmel_interrupt handler 
> must check the
> pass_counter before return IRQ_HANDLED.

I'm not sure if it helps in this particular case but yeah, since the
interrupt may be shared, it's definitely wrong to always return
IRQ_HANDLED.

Nice catch. Could you try the patch below?

Haavard

diff --git a/drivers/serial/atmel_serial.c b/drivers/serial/atmel_serial.c
index cb70cc5..f310a80 100644
--- a/drivers/serial/atmel_serial.c
+++ b/drivers/serial/atmel_serial.c
@@ -552,7 +552,7 @@ static irqreturn_t atmel_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
 		atmel_handle_transmit(port, pending);
 	} while (pass_counter++ < ATMEL_ISR_PASS_LIMIT);
 
-	return IRQ_HANDLED;
+	return pass_counter ? IRQ_HANDLED : IRQ_NONE;
 }
 
 /*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/