[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080204205950.GB14084@lst.de>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 15:59:52 -0500
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: hch@....de, npiggin@...e.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] add perform_write to a_ops
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 09:52:06PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> Moving up to higher layers might not be possible, due to lock/unlock
> of i_mutex being inside generic_file_aio_write().
Well some bits can be moved up. Here's my grand plan which I plan
to implement once I get some time for it (or let someone else do
if they beat me):
- generic_segment_checks goes to fs/read_write.c before caling into
the filesystem
- dito for vfs_check_frozen
- generic_write_checks is a suitable helper already
- dito for remove_suid
- dito for file_update_time
- after that there's not a whole lot left in generic_file_aio_write,
except for direct I/O handling which will probably be very fs-specific
if you have your own buffered I/O code
generic_file_buffered_write is an almost trivial wrapper around what's
->perform_write in Nick's earlier patches and a helper for the syncing
activity.
>
> But with fuse being the only user, it's not a huge issue duplicating
> some code.
>
> Nick, were there any other candidates, that would want to use such an
> interface in the future?
>
> Thanks,
> Miklos
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
---end quoted text---
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists