| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20080204140004.c2f82638.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 14:00:04 -0800 From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> Cc: jmorris@...ei.org, morgan@...nel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, serue@...ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] per-process securebits On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 18:17:22 +0000 Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote: > On Fri 2008-02-01 20:07:01, James Morris wrote: > > On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > Really? I'd feel a lot more comfortable if yesterday's version 1 had led > > > to a stream of comments from suitably-knowledgeable kernel developers which > > > indicated that those developers had scrutinised this code from every > > > conceivable angle and had declared themselves 100% happy with it. > > > > FWIW, I've reviewed the patch in detail a couple of times, and don't see > > any issues with it that haven't already been raised by Serge. > > > > You can add my reviewed-by. > > > > I think it does need more eyes, and some time baking in -mm. > > I don't thing -mm baking helps here. People playing with -mm are not > the ones trying to hack your box. > That's for sure. Whitebox testing and really really careful review is our best shot with this stuff. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists