linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.24-mm1: ppc32: too few arguments to function 'reserve

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 4 Feb 2008 14:40:36 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Mariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski@...land.pl>
Cc:	bwalle@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, paulus@...ba.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-mm1: ppc32: too few arguments to function
 'reserve_bootmem'

On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 21:29:02 +0100
Mariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski@...land.pl> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> 	This is from ppc32:
> 
>   CC      arch/powerpc/mm/mem.o
> arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c: In function 'do_init_bootmem':
> arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c:256: error: too few arguments to function 'reserve_bootmem'
> arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c:261: error: too few arguments to function 'reserve_bootmem'
> 
> Leftover from introduce-flags-for-reserve_bootmem.patch?
> 

Yes, I've had to fix that patch many times.

--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c~introduce-flags-for-reserve_bootmem-powerpc-fix
+++ a/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c
@@ -253,12 +253,13 @@ void __init do_init_bootmem(void)
 				     lmb_size_bytes(&lmb.reserved, i) - 1;
 		if (addr < total_lowmem)
 			reserve_bootmem(lmb.reserved.region[i].base,
-					lmb_size_bytes(&lmb.reserved, i));
+					lmb_size_bytes(&lmb.reserved, i),
+					BOOTMEM_DEFAULT);
 		else if (lmb.reserved.region[i].base < total_lowmem) {
 			unsigned long adjusted_size = total_lowmem -
 				      lmb.reserved.region[i].base;
 			reserve_bootmem(lmb.reserved.region[i].base,
-					adjusted_size);
+					adjusted_size, BOOTMEM_DWEFAULT);
 		}
 	}
 #else
_

We did this wrong.  We should have introduced a new reserve_bootmem_foo()
and migrated over to that in stages.  Once all callers are migrated, remove
the old interface.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/