linux-kernel - Re: [ppc] Disparity between sys_clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 4 Feb 2008 17:08:30 +1100
From:	tony@...eyournoodle.com (Tony Breeds)
To:	Sripathi Kodi <sripathik@...ibm.com>
Cc:	paulus@...ba.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [ppc] Disparity between sys_clock_getres and vdso implementation

On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 07:32:59PM +0530, Sripathi Kodi wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> 
> On PPC, I see a disparity between clock_getres implementations in the
> vdso and syscall. I am using a IBM Openpower hardware and 2.6.24 kernel
> with CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS=y. 
> 
> clock_getres call for CLOCK_REALTIME returns 1 millisecond. However,
> when I edit arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso*/gettimeofday.S to force it to use 
> sys_clock_getres, I get 1 nanosecond resolution. The code in vdso seems
> to be returning some pre-defined (incorrect) variables.
> 
> Could you please let me know the reason for this? Is it something that
> should be fixed in vdso?

Almost certainly It's something I missed when I enabled highres timers
on powerpc.

I'll fix this tomorrow.

Yours Tony

  linux.conf.au        http://linux.conf.au/ || http://lca2008.linux.org.au/
  Jan 28 - Feb 02 2008 The Australian Linux Technical Conference!

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/