linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] SH/Dreamcast - fix regressions, whitespace and memory leaks in Maple Bus driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1202113424.6489.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Mon, 04 Feb 2008 08:23:44 +0000
From:	Adrian McMenamin <adrian@...golddream.dyndns.info>
To:	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
Cc:	linux-sh <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SH/Dreamcast - fix regressions, whitespace and memory
	leaks in Maple Bus driver


On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 10:10 +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 08:00:47PM +0000, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
> > From: Adrian McMenamin
> > 
> This is useless if you are submitting the patch, especially if you're
> missing a mail address.
> 

>>From Documentation/SubmittingPatches

The canonical patch message body contains the following:
  * 
  *   - A "from" line specifying the patch author.
  * 


> > This patch fixes the regression noted here:
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/26/189 as well as whitespace issues in the
> > previous commit of this driver and the memory leaks noted here:
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/2/143 (as well as one or two other minor
> > cleanups).
> > 
> The subject notes 3 specific things that are being addressed, but you've
> rolled this all in to one patch which makes it utterly impossible to
> figure out what you're actually fixing. At the very least, split this in
> to 3 different patches, each dealing with one of the things noted in the
> subject. The fact that regressions is plural also suggests you may want
> to split this down in to smaller patches that deal with specific
> regressions if they are not directly related.
> 

What would be the point of submitting patches of broken code just to
remove the whitespace your previous commit added to all the lines?


> > Signed off by: Adrian McMenamin <adrian@...en.demon.co.uk>
> > 
> Do not invent new sign-off tags, see Documentation/SubmittingPatches.
> Scripts do end up having to parse this stuff.


Yes, sorry for that.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/