[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080205223740L.tomof@acm.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 22:38:02 +0900
From: FUJITA Tomonori <tomof@....org>
To: mangoo@...g.org
Cc: fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp
Subject: Re: [Scst-devel] Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel
On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 08:14:01 +0100
Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@...g.org> wrote:
> James Bottomley schrieb:
>
> > These are both features being independently worked on, are they not?
> > Even if they weren't, the combination of the size of SCST in kernel plus
> > the problem of having to find a migration path for the current STGT
> > users still looks to me to involve the greater amount of work.
>
> I don't want to be mean, but does anyone actually use STGT in
> production? Seriously?
>
> In the latest development version of STGT, it's only possible to stop
> the tgtd target daemon using KILL / 9 signal - which also means all
> iSCSI initiator connections are corrupted when tgtd target daemon is
> started again (kernel upgrade, target daemon upgrade, server reboot etc.).
I don't know what "iSCSI initiator connections are corrupted"
mean. But if you reboot a server, how can an iSCSI target
implementation keep iSCSI tcp connections?
> Imagine you have to reboot all your NFS clients when you reboot your NFS
> server. Not only that - your data is probably corrupted, or at least the
> filesystem deserves checking...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists