[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080205143149.GA4207@csn.ul.ie>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:31:50 +0000
From: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
To: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
Paul Jackson <pj@....com>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [2.6.24-rc8-mm1][regression?] numactl --interleave=all doesn't works on memoryless node.
On (04/02/08 13:20), Lee Schermerhorn didst pronounce:
> > > When the kernel behaviour changes and breaks user space then the kernel
> > > is usually wrong. Cc'ed Lee S. who maintains the kernel code now.
>
> The memoryless nodes patch series changed a lot of things, so just
> reverting this one area [mpol_check_policy()] probably won't restore the
> prior behavior. A fully populated node mask is not necessarily a proper
> subset of node_online_map(). And contextualize_policy() also requires
> the mask to be a subset of mems_allowed which also defaults to nodes
> with memory.
>
> I don't know how Mel Gorman's "two zonelist" series, which is still
> awaiting a window into the -mm tree, affects this behavior. Those
> patches will certainly be affected by whatever we decide here.
>
I doubt they'd make a difference to this particular problem.
--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists