linux-kernel - Re: [2.6 patch] remove smbfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 5 Feb 2008 10:17:02 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
Cc:	Guenter Kukkukk <linux@...kukk.com>,
	samba-technical@...ts.samba.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>, sfrench@...ba.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] remove smbfs

On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 06:31:14 -0500 Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com> wrote:

> > It looks like it's time?  If so, what should I set the date to?
> 
> Looks good to me. I'd suggest that we change the printk's to refer to a
> release version and state that it will be removed in for 2.6.26 (or
> 2.6.27 if that's not enough notice). Then, once the previous version is
> released, remove it from the tree as soon as possible.

OK.  smbfs is not exactly hurting us being there so I made it "will be
removed from the 2.6.27 kernel".  That gives the public the full
2.6.25->2.6.26 time period in which to discover what we're proposing and to
make any objections.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/