[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080205101702.361eb0e1.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 10:17:02 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
Cc: Guenter Kukkukk <linux@...kukk.com>,
samba-technical@...ts.samba.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>, sfrench@...ba.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] remove smbfs
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 06:31:14 -0500 Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com> wrote:
> > It looks like it's time? If so, what should I set the date to?
>
> Looks good to me. I'd suggest that we change the printk's to refer to a
> release version and state that it will be removed in for 2.6.26 (or
> 2.6.27 if that's not enough notice). Then, once the previous version is
> released, remove it from the tree as soon as possible.
OK. smbfs is not exactly hurting us being there so I made it "will be
removed from the 2.6.27 kernel". That gives the public the full
2.6.25->2.6.26 time period in which to discover what we're proposing and to
make any objections.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists