[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0802051104520.12425@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 11:07:36 -0800 (PST)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
cc: Pekka J Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: SLUB: Support for statistics to help analyze allocator behavior
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > Well we could do the same as for numa stats. Output the global count and
> > then add
> >
> > c<proc>=count
> >
>
> Yes, or the reverse, to avoid two loops and possible sum errors (Sum of
> c<proc>=count different than the global count)
The numa output uses only one loop and so I think we could do the same
here. Its good to have the global number first that way existing tools can
simply read a number and get what they intuitively expect.
> Since text##_show is going to be too big, you could use one function
> instead of several ones ?
Sure.
> (and char *buf is PAGE_SIZE, so you should add a limit ?)
Yes we must do so because support for 4k processors etc is on the horizon.
> Note I used for_each_possible_cpu() here instead of 'online' variant, or
> stats might be corrupted when a cpu goes offline.
Hmmm.. We are thinking about freeing percpu areas when a cpu goes offline.
So we would need to fold statistics into another cpu if this is a cocnern.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists