[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080205201106.GB26150@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 21:11:06 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Ross Vandegrift <ross@...listi.us>
Cc: Glenn Griffin <ggriffin.kernel@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add IPv6 support to TCP SYN cookies
> The problem is that any reasonably recent PC can generate enough
> forged SYN packets to overwhelm reasonable SYN queues on a much more
> powerful server.
Have you actually seen this with a recent kernel in the wild or are
you just talking theoretically?
Linux uses some heuristics to manage the syn queue that should
still ensure reasonable service even without cookies under attack.
Also SYN-RECV sockets are stored in a special data structure optimized
to use minimal resources.
It is far from the classical head drop method that was so vunerable
to syn flooding.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists