[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <165ac690802041807r147531d8s6bb5f3a1f254bcbb@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 20:07:01 -0600
From: "Chris Weiss" <cweiss@...il.com>
To: dougg@...que.net
Cc: "Alan Cox" <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"Mike Christie" <michaelc@...wisc.edu>,
"Vladislav Bolkhovitin" <vst@...b.net>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>,
"James Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
scst-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"FUJITA Tomonori" <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [Scst-devel] Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel
On Feb 4, 2008 11:30 AM, Douglas Gilbert <dougg@...que.net> wrote:
> Alan Cox wrote:
> >> better. So for example, I personally suspect that ATA-over-ethernet is way
> >> better than some crazy SCSI-over-TCP crap, but I'm biased for simple and
> >> low-level, and against those crazy SCSI people to begin with.
> >
> > Current ATAoE isn't. It can't support NCQ. A variant that did NCQ and IP
> > would probably trash iSCSI for latency if nothing else.
>
> And a variant that doesn't do ATA or IP:
> http://www.fcoe.com/
>
however, and interestingly enough, the open-fcoe software target
depends on scst (for now anyway)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists