linux-kernel - Re: [2.6.24-rc8-mm1][regression?] numactl --interleave=all doesn't works on memoryless node.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080205145141.ae658c12.pj@sgi.com>
Date:	Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:51:41 -0600
From:	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
To:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc:	Lee.Schermerhorn@...com, kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
	andi@...stfloor.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	clameter@....com, mel@....ul.ie
Subject: Re: [2.6.24-rc8-mm1][regression?] numactl --interleave=all doesn't
 works on memoryless node.

David wrote:
> The more alarming result of these remaps is in the MPOL_BIND case, as 
> we've talked about before.  The language in set_mempolicy(2):

You're diving into the middle of a rather involved discussion
we had on the other various patches proposed to extend the
interaction of mempolicy's with cpusets and hotplug.

I choose not to hijack this current thread with my rebuttal,
which you've seen before, of your points here.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.940.382.4214
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/