[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47A8CCC0.8020703@microgate.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 14:53:20 -0600
From: Paul Fulghum <paulkf@...rogate.com>
To: Rick Warner <rick@...roway.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: serial port regression caused by "Char: tty_ioctl, use wait_event_interruptible_timeout"
patch
Paul Fulghum wrote:
> Instead of reverting the patch can you try modifying
> this part of the patch:
>
> + if (wait_event_interruptible_timeout(tty->write_wait,
> + !tty->driver->chars_in_buffer(tty), timeout))
> + return;
>
> by changing it to:
>
> + if (wait_event_interruptible_timeout(tty->write_wait,
> + !tty->driver->chars_in_buffer(tty), timeout) < 0)
> + return;
>
> It looks like the patch changed the behavior of
> tty_wait_until_sent by not calling the driver
> specific wait_until_sent if a timeout occurs.
I mispoke, the patch changed the behavior by not
calling the driver specific wait_until_sent if
the condition is true.
Original behavior:
call driver->wait_until_sent() on
timeout or true condition
(skip for signal)
Patch behavior:
call driver->wait_until_sent() only
on timeout (rc == 0)
(skip for signal or true)
By modifying the patch as described above,
the original behavior is restored.
--
Paul Fulghum
Microgate Systems, Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists