linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.24-mm1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9255.1202246727@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date:	Tue, 05 Feb 2008 16:25:27 -0500
From:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-mm1

On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 11:50:11 PST, Arjan van de Ven said:
> > A bugfix?
> 
> yes it was a really painful bugfix, but still.

I'm not saying that it wasn't needed, it *was* a busticated API.

> I'll repeat the question. What would waiting for an -mm release have bought for this bugfix?
> Answer: nothing more than what was done on Linus git.

Just wondering what happened to the "large changes should percolate in -mm
for a bit beforehand" concept.  We've seen a lot of patchsets that totalled
up to a *lot* less intrusiveness get pushed off with "This needs to cook in
-mm for a while".  


Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped