From: Miklos Szeredi Add the following: /proc/sys/fs/types/${FS_TYPE}/usermount_safe Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi --- Index: linux/fs/filesystems.c =================================================================== --- linux.orig/fs/filesystems.c 2008-02-04 23:47:46.000000000 +0100 +++ linux/fs/filesystems.c 2008-02-04 23:48:04.000000000 +0100 @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include /* @@ -51,6 +52,57 @@ static struct file_system_type **find_fi return p; } +#define MAX_FILESYSTEM_VARS 1 + +struct filesystem_sysctl_table { + struct ctl_table_header *header; + struct ctl_table table[MAX_FILESYSTEM_VARS + 1]; +}; + +/* + * Create /sys/fs/types/${FSNAME} directory with per fs-type tunables. + */ +static int filesystem_sysctl_register(struct file_system_type *fs) +{ + struct filesystem_sysctl_table *t; + struct ctl_path path[] = { + { .procname = "fs", .ctl_name = CTL_FS }, + { .procname = "types", .ctl_name = CTL_UNNUMBERED }, + { .procname = fs->name, .ctl_name = CTL_UNNUMBERED }, + { } + }; + + t = kzalloc(sizeof(*t), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!t) + return -ENOMEM; + + + t->table[0].ctl_name = CTL_UNNUMBERED; + t->table[0].procname = "usermount_safe"; + t->table[0].maxlen = sizeof(int); + t->table[0].data = &fs->fs_safe; + t->table[0].mode = 0644; + t->table[0].proc_handler = &proc_dointvec; + + t->header = register_sysctl_paths(path, t->table); + if (!t->header) { + kfree(t); + return -ENOMEM; + } + + fs->sysctl_table = t; + + return 0; +} + +static void filesystem_sysctl_unregister(struct file_system_type *fs) +{ + struct filesystem_sysctl_table *t = fs->sysctl_table; + + unregister_sysctl_table(t->header); + kfree(t); +} + /** * register_filesystem - register a new filesystem * @fs: the file system structure @@ -80,6 +132,13 @@ int register_filesystem(struct file_syst else *p = fs; write_unlock(&file_systems_lock); + + if (res == 0) { + res = filesystem_sysctl_register(fs); + if (res != 0) + unregister_filesystem(fs); + } + return res; } @@ -108,6 +167,7 @@ int unregister_filesystem(struct file_sy *tmp = fs->next; fs->next = NULL; write_unlock(&file_systems_lock); + filesystem_sysctl_unregister(fs); return 0; } tmp = &(*tmp)->next; Index: linux/include/linux/fs.h =================================================================== --- linux.orig/include/linux/fs.h 2008-02-04 23:48:02.000000000 +0100 +++ linux/include/linux/fs.h 2008-02-04 23:48:04.000000000 +0100 @@ -1444,6 +1444,7 @@ struct file_system_type { struct module *owner; struct file_system_type * next; struct list_head fs_supers; + struct filesystem_sysctl_table *sysctl_table; struct lock_class_key s_lock_key; struct lock_class_key s_umount_key; Index: linux/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt =================================================================== --- linux.orig/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt 2008-02-04 23:47:58.000000000 +0100 +++ linux/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt 2008-02-04 23:48:04.000000000 +0100 @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ Table of Contents 2.14 /proc//io - Display the IO accounting fields 2.15 /proc//coredump_filter - Core dump filtering settings 2.16 /proc//mountinfo - Information about mounts + 2.17 /proc/sys/fs/types - File system type specific parameters ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Preface @@ -2392,4 +2393,34 @@ For more information see: Documentation/filesystems/sharedsubtree.txt +2.17 /proc/sys/fs/types/ - File system type specific parameters +---------------------------------------------------------------- + +There's a separate directory /proc/sys/fs/types// for each +filesystem type, containing the following files: + +usermount_safe +-------------- + +Setting this to non-zero will allow filesystems of this type to be +mounted by unprivileged users (note, that there are other +prerequisites as well). + +Fuse has been designed to be as safe as possible, and some +distributions already ship with unprivileged fuse mounts enabled by +default. There are still some situations (multi-user systems with +untrusted users in particular), where enabling this for fuse might not +be appropriate. For more details, see Documentation/filesystems/fuse.txt + +Procfs is also safe, but unprivileged mounting of it is not usually +necessary (bind mounting is equivalent). + +Most other filesystems are unsafe. Here are just some of the issues, +that must be resolved before a filesystem can be declared safe: + + - no strict input checking (buffer overruns, directory loops, etc) + - network filesystem deadlocks when mounting from localhost + - no permission checking when opening the device + - changing mount options when mounting a new instance of a filesystem + ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/