[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6101e8c40802051429r2942f8a7g5aa28b147603b669@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 23:29:35 +0100
From: "Oliver Pinter" <oliver.pntr@...il.com>
To: "Pete Zaitcev" <zaitcev@...hat.com>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Linux Kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, "James Morris" <jmorris@...ei.org>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.24 REGRESSION] BUG: Soft lockup - with VFS
i reverted this commit 7d699bafe258ebd8f9b4ec182c554200b369a504 , and
now compile ...
On 2/5/08, Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:05:06 -0800, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Looks like you deadlocked in ub_request_fn(). I assume that you were
> using
> > ub.c in 2.6.23 and that it worked OK? If so, we broke it, possibly via
> > changes to the core block layer.
> >
> > I think ub.c is basically abandoned in favour of usb-storage. If so,
> > perhaps we should remove or disble ub.c?
>
> Actually I think it may be an argument for keeping ub, if ub exposes
> a bug in the __blk_end_request. I'll look at the head of the thread
> and see if Mr. Pinter has hit anything related to Mr. Ueda's work.
>
> -- Pete
>
--
Thanks,
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists