[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1202188032.3096.196.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 23:07:12 -0600
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To: Matteo Tescione <matteo@...et.it>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>,
Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@...b.net>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>,
scst-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [Scst-devel] Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 05:43 +0100, Matteo Tescione wrote:
> Hi all,
> And sorry for intrusion, i am not a developer but i work everyday with iscsi
> and i found it fantastic.
> Altough Aoe, Fcoe and so on could be better, we have to look in real world
> implementations what is needed *now*, and if we look at vmware world,
> virtual iron, microsoft clustering etc, the answer is iSCSI.
> And now, SCST is the best open-source iSCSI target. So, from an end-user
> point of view, what are the really problems to not integrate scst in the
> mainstream kernel?
The fact that your last statement is conjecture. It's definitely untrue
for non-IB networks, and the jury is still out on IB networks.
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists