linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [1/2] Move NUMAQ io handling into arch/x86/pci/numa.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200802060915.01121.ak@suse.de>
Date:	Wed, 6 Feb 2008 09:15:00 +0100
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To:	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Cc:	tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	apw@...dowen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [1/2] Move NUMAQ io handling into arch/x86/pci/numa.c


> > +#define XQUAD_PORTIO_BASE 0xfe400000
>
> There is still a definition in include/asm-x86/io_32.h . Is this
> intentional?

Probably not.

>
> > +extern void *xquad_portio;    /* Where the IO area was mapped */
>
> Does the extern need to be here when you've added it (minus the comment)
> to mach_apic.h later in the patch?

The extern was intended to be removed, but somehow that change didn't make 
it into the final patch. Doesn't matter much either way though.

> Fix for "x86: move NUMAQ io handling into arch/x86/pci/numa.c"
>
> The intention of commit c7e844f0415252c7e1a2153a97e7a0c511d61ada was to
> replace a number of outl_quad() calls with a writel() equivilant. One of
> the changes was not equivilant. This patch corrects it.

Yes looks good; thanks.

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/