linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/6] udf: convert udf_stamp_to_time and udf_time_to

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080206111008.GD12547@duck.suse.cz>
Date:	Wed, 6 Feb 2008 12:10:08 +0100
From:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:	Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@...il.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] udf: convert udf_stamp_to_time and
	udf_time_to_stamp to use timestamps

On Tue 05-02-08 20:21:58, Marcin Slusarz wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 04:59:56PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Sun 03-02-08 19:36:09, marcin.slusarz@...il.com wrote:
> > > kernel_timestamp type was almost unused - only callers of udf_stamp_to_time
> > > and udf_time_to_stamp used it, so let these functions handle endianness
> > > internally and don't clutter code with conversions
> >   OK, but please also rename the functions to something like
> > udf_disk_stamp_to_time() and udf_time_to_disk_stamp() so that the name
> > suggests that it internally handles endianess...
> Ok, should I redo this patch or create separate patch on top of it?
  Please, just redo this one. Thanks.

									Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/