[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080206162210.7fcd5244@dhcp-252-066.norway.atmel.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 16:22:10 +0100
From: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...el.com>
To: michael <trimarchi@...dalf.sssup.it>
Cc: Remy Bohmer <linux@...mer.net>, fabio@...dalf.sssup.it,
Andrew Victor <linux@...im.org.za>,
Chip Coldwell <coldwell@...hat.com>,
Marc Pignat <marc.pignat@...s.ch>,
David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm v4 6/9] atmel_serial: Split the interrupt handler
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 14:41:09 +0100
michael <trimarchi@...dalf.sssup.it> wrote:
> I refer to this part of documentation:
>
> "The USART behavior when hardware handshaking is enabled is the same as
> the behavior in
> standard synchronous or asynchronous mode, except that the receiver
> drives the RTS pin as
> described below and the level on the CTS pin modifies the behavior of
> the transmitter as
> described below. Using this mode requires using the PDC channel for
> reception. The transmitter
> can handle hardware handshaking in any case."
Oh. I guess the answer is no, then.
Haavard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists