[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080206194040.GA11886@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 14:40:40 -0500
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, kexec@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH], issue EOI to APIC prior to calling crash_kexec in
die_nmi path
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 02:25:55PM -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
> Hey all-
> A hang on kdump was reported to me awhile back, only when systems died
> via nmi watchdog panic. The hang wouldn't always be in the same place, but it
> would usually be somewhere down in purgatory. In looking at the code, it
> occured to me that since, during an nmi interrupt, we won't be able to handle
> additional interrupts, that we won't be able to halt the other processors on a
> system like we try to do in machine_crash_shutdown. As such, it appears that
> leaving the other cpus running exposes us to the risk that another processor
> will encounter an error and halt the system while we are trying to boot the
> kdump kernel, and that can result in a hang. I wrote the attached patch to end
> the nmi interrupt prior to calling crash_kexec from within die_nmi, and testing
> here has proven successfull.
>
Hi Neil,
Why wouldn't I be able to stop other cpus if I am inside an NMI handler? I
just need to send an NMI IPI to other cpus and they should be able to
receive and handle it?
Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists