linux-kernel - Re: [Regression] 2.6.24-git9: RT sched mishandles artswrapper (bisected)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1202334228.6274.1.camel@lappy>
Date:	Wed, 06 Feb 2008 22:43:48 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [Regression] 2.6.24-git9: RT sched mishandles artswrapper
	(bisected)


On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 19:25 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, 6 of February 2008, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > 
> > On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 09:40 +0100, Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
> > > On 06/02/2008, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, 5 of February 2008, Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
> > > > > Rafael, any progress with this issue? (a few questions below).
> > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Does this artsmessage thing also run with RT priority?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Well, it's in a strange state (after it's broken).  From top:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > PR = -51
> > > > > > NI = 0
> > > > > > S = R
> > > > > > %CPU = 0.0
> > > > > > %MEM = 0.0
> > > > >
> > > > > cat /proc/$PID/stat ; sleep 3; cat /proc/$PID/stat ?
> > > > > cat /proc/sched_debug; sleep 3 ; cat /proc/sched_debug
> > > >
> > > > Well, instead please find appended a test program that allows me to trigger
> > > > the issue.
> > > 
> > > Great, I'll look at this problem in the everning (sure, if nobody else
> > > is faster :-).
> > 
> > Yeah, it seems fixed here (after I made my current queue compile for
> > this silly CONFIG_USER_SCHED thing again).
> > 
> > I'm now refusing realtime tasks in groups that do not have real-time
> > bandwidth assigned.
> 
> If you're referring to this patch: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/4/332 , then
> sorry, but it doesn't fix the issue for me, with the attached config.

Well, that whole queue. Your test program just failed to obtain realtime
scheduling but didn't hang. I'll test your full config.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/