linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 12/11] sched: rt-group: uid-group interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080207041721.GA11520@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Thu, 7 Feb 2008 09:47:22 +0530
From:	Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>, vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	dmitry.adamushko@...il.com, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/11] sched: rt-group: uid-group interface

On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 04:05:31PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > Ingo, Greg,
> > > > 
> > > > What would be the easiest way to carry this forward? sched-devel and
> > > > greg's tree would intersect at this point and leave poor akpm with the
> > > > resulting mess. Should I just make an incremental patch akpm can carry
> > > > and push? Or can we base one tree off the other?
> > > 
> > > If it's just a single patch for this, I'd be glad to take it.  But by 
> > > looking at the [11/12] above, I doubt this is so...
> > > 
> > > If it's not that rough (12 patches is not a big deal), I'd be glad to 
> > > take these through my tree, after you fix up Kay's requests above :)
> > 
> > hm, i'd really like to see this tested and go through sched.git. It's 
> > only the few sysfs bits which interfere, right?
> 
> Yes, that should be it.
> 
> So why not put the majority of this through sched.git, then when my
> sysfs changes go in at the beginning of the .25 merge cycle, you can
> then add the sysfs changes through your tree or anywhere else.
> 

Hi,

I was wondering where these changes are right now. I don't see the sysfs
interface for rt-group-sched in mainline right now.

Thanks,
-- 
regards,
Dhaval
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/