[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.00.0802071254590.9204@apollo.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 13:16:04 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
cc: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Stable Team <stable@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [stable] The SMP alternatives code breaks exception fixup?
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 03:19:33PM -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> > On 01/22/2008 07:35 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > >
> > > That's a long standing bug in both the PI futex and the standard futex
> > > code. Needs to go to stable as well.
> > >
> >
> > Here's the 2.6.23 version:
> >
> >
> > Subject: x86: fix missing exception entry for SMP alternatives in futex macros
> > From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>
> I don't see this in Linus's tree, am I just missing it? Do you have a
> git commit id?
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=9d55b9923a1b7ea8193b8875c57ec940dc2ff027
I did a simpler version by just replacing LOCK_PREFIX with lock. The
reason is, that we would need a separate implementation for
__futex_atomic_op1() as well, due to:
case FUTEX_OP_ADD:
__futex_atomic_op1(LOCK_PREFIX "xaddl %0, %2", ret, oldval,
And it's not really worth the trouble.
Backport to 2.6.24 and 2.6.23 attached.
Thanks,
tglx
View attachment "futex-2-6-23.patch" of type "TEXT/PLAIN" (2973 bytes)
View attachment "futex-2-6-24.patch" of type "TEXT/PLAIN" (2913 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists